Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Conflicting Idea

Here's another way communication technology is hindering communication — it makes it easier for us to demonize our opponents.


This week I have had disagreements with political opponents and with my homeowners association. Neither disagreement happened in person. Neither included a handshake or a cup of coffee. And both have led to significant stress and tension. I just can't help but think that those discussions would have gone better if I could have sat down with the other party and looked them in the eye. It's easy to deny requests, suspect motives, and even call names when there's no relational impact to those actions, when you don't have to face the person you're insulting. Facebook, email, telephones, even postal mail are all poor forums for conflict.

So are passing lanes. I know a young man who lost his sight and almost lost his life because of the road rage of someone he had never met. Would that angry driver have shot someone who cut in line at Starbucks instead of on an exit ramp? Probably not. Like communications media, cars make us anonymous and therefore more easily "othered".

Maybe Jesus had it right when he said, “If your brother or sister sins, go and point out their fault, just between the two of you."

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Resting


I love this description of Sabbath so I'm going to write it again: Sabbath is a reminder that we are human. Psalm 121:4 says that God never sleeps. But we do. We have to. Have you ever known anyone who never slept? I have. They were called architecture majors. They weren't human. But for the rest of us, we have to rest. Every night we get this reminder that we aren't God. And once a week we need to purposefully rest.

That's harder than it sounds. The age-old temptation — the one that tempted Eve in the garden — is to pretend that we are God, to behave like we don't have those limitations. So we work seven days a week. We work nights. We refuse to be quiet. We think, "I'll just get through this busy time and then take a break" while we ingrain the habit of ignoring our nature and God's design.

Sabbath is a discipline that saves us from that. Sabbath is codified humility.

What about you? Are you practicing sane rhythms or work and rest?

Sunday, June 09, 2013

Underground, Overcrowded

My friend Shawn Small is a master traveler. He's so savvy, in fact, other people pay him to help them travel well. Last week, a shortened version of my most feeble travel story appeared on his blog. If you want insightful thoughts on God, travel and culture, you should follow Shawn. If you want an extended laugh at a travel novice, read on.



Some lessons are best learned in solitude. Some are best learned through failure. And some come most clearly while stranded in a dark subway tunnel under Paris. 

When Christine and I were 25 — still acting like kids and newlyweds — we made our first visit to Europe. We had a friend, Selena, doing graduate work at the University of Liverpool and we decided that was as good an excuse as any to visit the UK. Selena was also friends with Christine's sister Ellen, so we decided to take her along. Of the many mistakes that colored this trip, that was among the biggest. Do not go to Europe with your sister-in-law; I don't care how nice she is. You will find yourself watching other couples stroll romantic cobblestone streets in the City of Light while you eat at Chili's and carry extra bags. 

The second mistake we made on this trip was to overbook it. We should have been content with Liverpool and London. Instead, we crammed in Scotland and Paris. I would have traded all of the latter for more of the former, but it's the latter that taught me the lesson of this story.

A third mistake (the list of mistakes could go on for pages but I'll stop at three for now) was that none of us spoke French. Christine's French was the best among us but it was still shaky. We were staking our travel on the language skills of a 25-year-old who, when worried about making a flight on time, asked a cabbie, "How many minutes does the airport have?" 

On the penultimate day of our trip, a Sunday, Christine, Ellen and I awoke in the center of Paris, two blocks from the Champs-Elysees. Thirty-six hours later, we were supposed to be resting on our own beds. Between Sunday morning and Monday afternoon, we were scheduled to catch a subway train out of city center to a station named Laplace, transfer to an airport shuttle in the suburbs (we weren't flying from de Gaulle, of course, because we were 25 and trying to pinch every penny possible), catch a flight to London, ride a bus back to Liverpool where we could stay with Selena for free, and get up early for our low-fare-no-refund flight back to the states. If any of those transportation dominoes failed to fall in line, we would be stranded in Europe. Stranded in Europe with your vivacious young wife isn't a bad prospect. Stranded in Europe with your wife and her sister is completely different. 

Ellen has severe allergies and asthma, so Paris was hard on her. Our Sunday had an ominous beginning when she threw up in a subway concourse and had to explain it to police. We hadn't even touched the first domino in our journey home when we found ourselves huddled around a garbage can in an empty subway corridor, patting Ellen on the back and hoping not to be delayed too long. Just then, three men in fatigues and berets walked around the corner. Two of them were carrying assault rifles. I still don't know if they were police, military, or terrorists but they seemed to think we were a threat to public safety, or just Americans which, I came to believe, were synonyms to most Parisians. They asked us, "Is there a problem here?" We did our best to make them understand that we were only sick and weary travelers, a communication that failed until Christine, our language expert, used the universal sound and sign language for vomit, at which point they retreated. We managed to buy train tickets and hop aboard just in time. We were headed home. 

The streets and subway in Paris are largely vacant early on Sunday mornings. There was little conversation as our train clattered through its tunnel. Ellen was still feeling sick and the rocking of the train didn't help. There were only two other people on the train with us. At one stop, two stations ahead of Laplace, the doors opened, a voice made an announcement in French which we did not understand, both of our fellow travelers got off, and the train sped away again. It seemed like every other stop along the line. But then our train halted. Suddenly. Unexpectedly. In the tunnel. In the dark. Not at a platform. Turns out, that announcement we didn't understand was explaining that we had reached the end of the line for shortened Sunday service. Our train and its conductor were ending their shifts and we were stranded somewhere under Paris contemplating the very real possibility of hiking through dark subway tunnels in search of escape. Ellen barfed again. 

Apparently, thanks to previous traveling American idiots like us, or due to admirable French foresight, there is a rule in place for Parisian train conductors that they have to sweep their train for stowaways before they park it for good. We were in the last car and, eventually, the conductor found us, fidgeting and worrying next to our puddle of American vomit. He was unhappy. We got a tongue-lashing that I'm certain would have been offensive if we knew what he was saying, and eventually understood from him that we should not exit the train and walk aimlessly through the tunnels under Paris. We should stay put. He would take us back to the last stop. 

That was a help but not as much help as we needed. We were still two stops away from our transfer point at Laplace and time was ticking. In a mad rush, we read time tables to find another route to Laplace, dashed up and down stairs to the designated platform, jumped aboard, and hoped that this line, too, wasn't shortened for Sunday service. This was the long way — it would require an extra transfer — but we were back on our way to Laplace, and to Texas.

Our train was now above ground and we were happy to see the warm, golden hue of sunlight splashed against the graffiti-ridden sound walls that lined our new route. We made several stops, inching closer to Laplace and hoping to fell all the dominoes just in time. And that's when Christine's French kicked in again. We stopped at a station called Maison Lafitte. An announcement came on and Christine shot up from her chair. With a look of terror in her eyes she gasped, "He said…he said…it's-a-no-good!" Then she grabbed her bag and bounded off the train.

Christine had recognized an important word in the announcement; something that sounded like "terminus". Her communique, "It's-a-no-good!" was meant to convey that we had to get off the train or risk another delay and another tongue-lashing from an angry conductor. Ellen and I didn't interpret as quickly as we should have. We did our best to follow Christine's lead but Ellen was groggy from nausea and I was carrying my bags as well as hers. By the time we gathered ourselves and moved toward the exit, the doors were closing. There was a moment, forever seared in my memory, when I lunged my luggage-laden hands toward the doors, seeing my young wife on the platform outside, still with terror in her eyes, mouthing the word, "Noooooo!" 

Too late. The train was moving, leaving Christine behind. Through the windows, I managed to send her one final message. I pointed to the platform and shouted, "Stay here!" 

Ellen and I sped away toward the "terminus" which, this time, was an enormous train yard above ground. We knew the drill. The train stopped. The conductor ambled aft. We stood in the doorway of our car, rather proud this time to know our way around "terminus" and not to have soiled his train with the waning contents of Ellen's stomach. We had the pleasure of meeting two conductors this time — one ending his shift and another beginning his. The two stood on the ground next to the train and spoke in angry tones while making animated gestures toward us. Then they shook hands, said good-bye, and the new conductor mounted his train and drove us back to town. 

On the ride back in, Ellen and I did some math. We expected to get back to Maison Lafitte just four minutes before another train that could still deliver us to Laplace in time to catch the shuttle in time to catch our flight to London. From here on out, we needed everything to go right or all was lost. I gave something of a pep-talk, encouraging Ellen to fight through her nausea. 

We arrived at Maison Lafitte and saw Christine across the station. Now that we were in-bound, our train was on a different set of tracks, one removed from the platform where we left Christine. To get to her, we had to race up stairs, across a street, and back down to ground level. We had no time to spare. We shot up the steps and raced to the turnstile that guarded the steps down to Christine. This particular turnstile wasn't just the people-counter version you cross to get on roller coasters. It was a fortified gate built into a chain link fence. I slid my paper train pass into the automated turnstile, and it popped back out at me. The gate stayed closed. I tried again. Nothing. Ellen tried. Same result. Then it occurred to me that our tickets wouldn't work at Maison Lafitte because we were never supposed to catch a train here. Just then I looked down the tracks to see our train chugging into view. I grabbed Ellen's bag and threw it over the fence. I shouted, "Climb!" and started to hoist my sister-in-law over a chain-link fence in an effort to trespass on French mass transit. 

It didn't work. Ellen couldn't make the climb and I realized we were too late anyway. We watched the train pull to a stop and load several passengers who would have preferred to stay and watch the desperate American sideshow. Christine came to the turnstile, eyes red with tears, grabbed the bag I had thrown over the fence, and exited the Parisian train system for the last time, defeated. 

We had one final course of action and we took it. There was a cab stand outside Maison Lafitte and, even though we were far from the airport, we asked a cabbie if he could get us there in time for our flight. He saw it as both a challenge and an opportunity. I am certain of two things about that cab ride: we did not pay the standard fare, and we got to the airport in time. Thirty-five hours later, we were home. 

There are a lot of lessons to be learned from my experience in Paris. Probably the most obvious is this: Don't go to Paris. They speak another language there. Also, sister-in-law-vomit isn't charming even in the most romantic city in the world.

But the more subtle and more personal lesson for me had to do with my heritage. I grew up in a rural Texas town of 1,200 people. I like to visit cities and I can make a living in suburbs, but I am most deeply at home in locales where people are sparse. A week before the debacle at Maison Lafitte, Christine and I had enjoyed a lovely, relaxing overnight in Fort William, Scotland. We met some locals who did us a favor. We explored a highland walk dotted with sheep. We sampled haggis. It was quaint and pastoral with no drama and no angry train conductors. I'm not sure that the difference between our Scottish and French experiences can be attributed entirely to language (some of the brogue spoken is Scotland was as hard to understand as French). In France I realized my fluency in a language whose alphabet is solitude and whose grammar is neighborliness. In the immortal words of John Denver, "I'm just a country boy." It took being stranded in the Paris underground to learn that. 

Saturday, June 08, 2013

SportsCenter Losing Center

SportsCenter has jumped the shark. I hate to say that; SC has been a part of my life since high school when it looked like this:



SportsCenter was a groundbreaking program then and has continued to be the worldwide leader in sports journalism for more than 30 years. These days, my SC viewing is less frequent than it used to be, but I still tune in regularly to keep up-to-date with Stuart Scott's wardrobe and the latest SC anchor catch phrases (Yahtzee!) But my two most recent virtual visits to Bristol left me disappointed, not at the quality of the prose or presentation (I still love to hear Scott Van Pelt intone "useful"), but with shifting SC journalistic standards. I think SportsCenter is failing in two areas: hard work and fairness.

Work Ethic

I tuned in SC one weekday morning several days ago expecting to see an hour's worth of game recaps, highlights, trend stories and maybe some colorful commentary from irate sports figures. Instead, I watched at least 15 solid minutes of Robert Griffin III stretching at Redskins OTAs. Stretching! While I watched RGIII touch his toes, I listened to a team of "experts" talk about the physical, mental and relational aspects of his return to action which is expected to happen in August. I was watching in May.

I realize the NFL is the biggest of big sports and that RGIII's injury is a big story on a big stage, but I couldn't help but wonder, "Weren't there any baseball games last night? Aren't NBA and NHL playoffs going on? Wasn't there tennis or cycling or curling or cheese-wheel-chasing to discuss? And even if there aren't game stories, wouldn't this be a good time to unveil some stellar reporting from some of the best and highest-paid sports journalists on the planet? Instead of any of those options, SC is giving way to Pundits-On-Parade and I think the reason is simple: it's easier. It's much cheaper and faster to bring an "expert" in studio and let him blather on for five minutes over B-roll of stretching exercises than it is to send a reporter into the field to conduct interviews, research information, gather quotes, look for themes, and dig out real stories. I think we're seeing ESPN's journalism getting soft.

Fair Play

And now SportsCenter is choosing sides. One of the most important and nuanced responsibilities of any news outlet is gatekeeping. Fair and balanced reporting isn't just about how stories are reported, it's about which stories are reported. The second discouraging experience I had with SportsCenter happened yesterday when I watched a six-minute segment in which SC anchor Hannah Storm interviewed Baltimore Ravens linebacker Brandon Ayanbadejo about his political views. The news peg for this interview was that Ayanbadejo and his teammates visited the White House this week to be congratulated by the president on their Super Bowl victory. It's a time-honored tradition and a worthy news story. I broke down the interview topics below:

  • Ravens visit to the White House - one question, 30 seconds
  • Ravens receiving Super Bowl rings - one question, 15 seconds
  • Ayanbadejo's career - one question, 45 seconds 
  • Gay rights - six questions, four minutes

In fairness, I will point out that this turn of events may have caught my attention because I happen to disagree with Ayanbadejo. I like to think that I would see the bias in SC's approach even if I agreed with the agenda they were promoting, but I will acknowledge that I'm human and less prone to cry "foul" when the foul supports my position.

But my beef with SC isn't which political agenda they are pushing, it's that they are pushing one at all. By any journalistic standard, this was ideological gatekeeping. Here's why: Google "Ravens visit White House" and eight of the top nine results will be about the team's starting center. Matt Birk declined the White House invitation as an act of protest against the administration's support of state-funded abortion. That's news. When a prominent sports figure (the starting center for the Super Bowl champion team certainly qualifies) declines an invitation to the White House as an act of civil resistance, it's worth covering. Every major news outlet in the country agreed. They all covered Birk's absence: CBS SportsHuffington Post, Los Angeles Times, Yahoo! Sports, Baltimore Sun, USA Today, MSN, Sporting News, and dozens more. But in an hour-long program whose purpose is to cover the major sports news of the day, ESPN couldn't find the time.

And this wasn't an accident. There was a conversation somewhere in the Bristol newsroom to highlight the gay marriage issue instead of the abortion issue. How do I know? Because those are exactly the conversations that happen in every newsroom. It's what newsrooms are for. To suggest that such a conversation never happened is to suggest that SportsCenter producers are completely inept. There are two scenarios here: In the first, ESPN hadn't heard about the Birk boycott, or didn't grasp its news peg that every other major news outlet acknowledged. In this scenario, SC journalists are just bad at their jobs. The second scenario is that they had the conversation and decided to ignore the Birk story and replace it with manufactured news - a four-minute segment about a political position completely unrelated to any news peg. In this scenario, SC journalists are putting their own politics ahead of the news. As the old saying goes, "never let the facts get in the way of a good story."

Of course, this isn't new. For years now, news organizations across the country have been fleeing the fair-and-balanced center in a race to political extremes. It's nearly impossible to find journalists making an honest effort at balanced coverage whether they work at Fox News, CNN, major networks, or - sadly now - the worldwide leader in sports.

I'll still watch SportsCenter occasionally. I like to watch the Top 10 and roll my eyes at Steven A. Smith. But I'm afraid the Halcyon Days of Bob Ley and balanced reporting are fading like Joe Theismann's memory. If they can just get Jon Anderson on waterskis, SportsCenter might actually jump the shark soon. For now, I guess we'll have to tune in to Wipeout for that.