Wednesday, August 01, 2012
The Gay Chicken Debate
Today, thousands of amateur activists for traditional marriage will buy lunch from Chick-Fil-A. Maybe millions. Thousands of activists for gay marriage will also visit CFA locations to picket, argue or order water. This could go very badly. I cringe at the thought of media reports tomorrow about shouting, violence or arrests at Chick-Fil-A locations across the country. I pray that doesn't happen.
The question I keep asking is, "Why are we doing this?" What do we Christians think we're going to accomplish with National-Straight-People-Eat-Chicken-Day? Here are a few of the most common lines of thought.
Be not ashamed
There's a legitimate sense among evangelicals that the good old days are gone and our country is moving away from a Christian worldview toward a humanist one. I think it's hard to argue otherwise. For more than two centuries, Christians (especially Protestants) enjoyed a cushy life in America. With laws and cultural norms deeply influenced by our religion, we didn't have to deal with opposing viewpoints very often. That is clearly changing and Christians are right to worry that immorality is both accepted and legalized, that ultimate truth is undermined, and that peer pressure is turning to persecution.
The unconsidered response to those developments goes something like this: "That's not right. That shouldn't be! Someone has to do something. I'm going to stand up for truth! Let's eat chicken!"
But I think a more measured response might be more Christlike. Is huddling at CFA with other christians really the best way to stem America's moral decline? Remember, the early church refused to be silent about Jesus, not politics, and they did so at the risk of losing their lives, not their chicken biscuits. Refusing to renounce one's faith in a Roman coliseum is a far cry from denouncing gay marriage in a fast food joint.
Serving as the conscience of others
To be sure, many in our culture have calloused or perverted hearts that could use pricking. As do many in our pews. But the New Testament never admonishes us to rebuke immoral behavior in unbelievers, only in our brothers and sisters. Unbelievers are supposed to behave like unbelievers. We should stop expecting people who believe there is no ultimate truth to adjust their lifestyles to ultimate good. Instead, the pattern the Bible promotes is for us to rebuke one another inside the church — sharpen, love and encourage one another to the point that we're so Christlike that unbelievers want to be like us.
Let your light shine before men that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.
— Matt. 5:16
Live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing wrong, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day He visits us.
— 1 Pet. 2:12
Here's a tip: if you're picketing, boycotting, condemning or otherwise demonstrating against the behaviors or beliefs of others, no one wants to be like you. Activism is not the way to win friends and influence people.
Standing up for free speech
This is probably the most logical reason for the demonstration but also the most insincere. Yes, Dan Cathy has every right to speak his political and religious views, and run his company any way he likes. And yes, customers have every right to visit or avoid his stores because of those views. But for Christians to suddenly take up the mantle of free speech seems a bit disingenuous. The same constitution that protects Dan Cathy's speech also protects war protestors, gay pride parades, and porn publishers. Christians quickly lose their First Amendment fervor when the topics change.
Whatever the reasons for the CFA demonstration, no one is pretending that it will actually lead to a better place. No one thinks thousands of Christians are going to show up at CFA and win the argument — as if every gay American will wake up tomorrow and think, "Hmm. Those people all ate chicken on the same day. They must be right. I'm straight."
Instead, the lesson gays are more likely to take away is simply that Christians are spoiling for a fight.
So if the CFA demonstration isn't going to accomplish anything healthy, what will it do? I think what we're actually accomplishing is marginalizing our own message. We seem to have forgotten in the public sphere a truth that we all embrace in our churches — that heart change happens in the context of relationships.
Which brings me to the most troublesome facet of this issue: we are increasingly removing ourselves from the culture. More and more, evangelicals are neither in the world nor of it. A friend of mine recently quoted one author (I'm sorry I haven't been able to track down which author) who wrote that the problem with social justice in the American church is not that Christians don't love the poor; it's just that they don't know them. The same is true for gays. I would venture to guess that less than half of American evangelicals have a gay friend. We seem more than happy to go out of our way to protest gay issues, but not to meet gay people.
Recently, I went to lunch with two gay friends to talk about the gay marriage issue. We didn't solve any great public policy debates, but we did express care for one another. We treated one another like real people, not like political opponents.
That may be the best thing to come out of today's CFA debate. Maybe instead of escalating to shouts and violence, people from both sides of this debate might meet one another at the fast food counter, learn one another's names, and get out of their comfort zones. If you're planning to show up at CFA today, I encourage you to love your political opponents the way Jesus loved you when he called you out of darkness into light. If you see someone ordering water, consider buying a meal for them. Learn their name. Express your concern that this whole thing has come across as judgmental. Maybe even pray for them. Better yet, skip the chicken and visit them on their turf, not yours. Show up on Friday for the "kiss-in" and make some new friends. Forget about protecting your righteous image long enough to reach out to your fellow man.
Chick-Fil-A didn't invent the chicken sandwich, but if we do this right, they might be inventing a new, more civil forum for political and religious discourse. That's what I'm praying for.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Very well done
I am a Christian. I am a conservative. I am not eating at Chic Fil A every day this week in support of Dan Cathy's definition of the family. I am eating at Chic Fil A every single day this week to send a message to Rahm Emanuel, Boston Mayor Menino, and every other left leaning media outlet / commentator......that attempts to stifle, chill, & remove opnions that differ from their own. THAT is the issue. The marketplace is fully capable of deciding the validity of the Chic Fil A product/service. An elected government official making veiled threats to halt/impair the operations of a business within their city based on the contrary opinion of a private citizen is completely unacceptable. If the roles were reversed and the product/service the same, I would be doing the exact same thing.
I don't see this as just an "Evangelical" or "Christian" issue. And definitely not an opportunity to rub it in the militant gay movement's face as some are suggesting. The important issue is that millions of Americans are fed up with a government so arrogant and out of control that they actually threaten to police private citizens' thoughts. This is an appalling trend and threatens everyone in this nation, not just evangelicals. This is a prime opportunity for every American who cherishes freedom -- straight, gay, Christian, Buddhist, atheist, whatever -- to unite and demonstrate that we will not stand for continued government overreach.
Ryan, this article by the guy who started "promoting" eating chicken today, explains here that it is NOT a protest, and the media is trying to paint it that way. I sooo agree with you that we should be salt and light and do what Jesus did, love all mankind and be there FOR them. However, I don't think today was ever intended for anything but to send a message to government. I am reposting:
Mike Huckabee
Yesterday
A little over a week ago, I simply urged people to go and eat at Chick Fil-A on Wednesday, August 1. I mentioned it on my TV show and have been discussing it on my daily radio show. The media has called it a "protest." It is most certainly not. No one is protesting anything. This is not a stand against a person, a group of people, or even someone else's belief. This is a simple act of having a meal at a place that sells chicken, not politics. It's to affirm to a Christian brother, Dan Cathy, that he has not been disenfranchised from his citizenship nor his right of free speech as a taxpaying American. It is about taking a stand for businesses to be free of economic bullying and hate speech. It is an opportunity to have a decent meal at a decent place that was founded and continues to be run by decent people who believe in treating their customers and employees with kindness and to say "thank you" to them. The only protest that I know of is coming from the chickens, who will give their lives in large numbers to accommodate what hopefully will be a big day at Chick Fil-A.
Chick Fil-A neither proposed this nor has promoted it. It was a simple idea I had and shared with a few friends, posted the online and asked them to share with their friends. I don't have that many friends, but my friends seem to. Since then, over 21 million have viewed my Facebook event page. We are north of half a million people who have said they will eat at Chick Fil-A on Wednesday and still adding more. Millions more are aware of it and might show up in one of the 1600 Chick Fil-A stores.
The attacks on Christians are disturbing, especially by "wanna be tyrants, like the mayors of Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, and Washington, D. C. who have vowed to either keep Chick Fil-A out of their communities or have openly said this business is not welcome because they (the mayors) don't agree with the personal views of the Chick Fil- A CEO. Not only is such a position by the mayors illegal and unconstitutional, but it's disturbing to think that anyone elected to public office would publicly exhibit their bigotry toward Christians, their hypocrisy in singling out only Christians, but not others including Muslims who have even stronger beliefs about same sex marriage, and their contempt of the law regarding censorship and free speech.
On Wednesday, the lines might be long, but your presence and your purchase is a statement. America doesn't need more protesters-we'll leave that to the Occupy crowd. America needs more protectors of freedom, family, and faith. And in this case, chicken nuggets!
Good thoughts Ryan! The media loves to portray Christians as bigots and this entire ordeal was not helpful in dispelling that image, however, it's not like Dan Cathy was standing on the street corner broadcasting his stance on gay marriage...it was brought up in an interview and the gay community surely endorsed going forward with making his comments an issue or the media would not have pushed the issue as far as they have.
On another note, porn (obscenity) is not protected by the first amendment, we just don't have very many leaders who are willing to prosecute it! The Obama administration has not prosecuted one case. Check out "The Miller Test".
Also, there are believers who are attracted to the same sex and are involved in same sex relationships so it's wrong to assume that all gays are unbelievers. (Disclosure - I have a daughter who is a believer who is in a same sex relationship - her partner is also a believer). Life is messy and God is mysterious. The Christian community itself is divided on this issue and we need God's wisdom as to how to best represent Him as we deal with the cultural shift on this issue from a Biblical worldview. We need to practice love in all circumstances and I agree that a line wrapped around Chick-fil-a isn't a great sign of love for the homosexual community. #failure!!
Lastly, the reason that many folks don't have a gay friend is that even though most sitcoms, movies, etc...portray same sex relationships as the norm in every group of friends, in reality, it's more like 2% - 4% of the population. Kinsey's studies at Indiana University (10%) have been proven to be fraudulent (Hollywood still made a movie about him that portrayed his studies as relevant) and even though when polled most Americans guess the gay community to be at 15% - 25% of the general population every serious study consistently arrives at between 2% - 4%. It's not right to avoid being friends with someone who is gay but really there just aren't as many of them as the media would like for us to believe so if you have a gay friend consider that God may have placed you in his/her life as an instrument of his love and care for them!
John, Mike and Jeleeblack- Good points about government intrusion. I didn't read much about the Boston / Chicago angle (I like in Texas), but I agree that government restrictions on businesses that support a certain religious viewpoint is unconstitutional. But let's not try to pretend that this is entirely about free speech. It wouldn't have drawn half the attention that it did from anyone (Christians, media, politicians, etc.) if Dan Cathy had made a statement about a less hot button issue. Again, are we passionate about free speech or just free speech that we like?
Debbie- Good to hear from you! Thank you for commenting. Great input!
I think the problem with the Miller Test is that it's based on "community standards" don't you? What was offensive to the average person in 1812 is a lot different than what's offensive to the average person in 2012. Also what's offensive to the average person in Dallas might not be offensive to the average person in L.A. And all of it is protected if it's not offensive based on "community standards".
I absolutely didn't mean to equate Christian with straight or gay with lost. I'm sorry if it came across that way.
And I can appreciate the numbers regarding the gay population but I'm not sure that should impact how we approach the gay issue. Muslims are a minority too, but I think Christians ought to be intentional about reaching Muslims. Same should go for gays.
Our society stands or falls on freedom of speech Gay activist seek to intimidate any prominent figure who dare speaks out in contradistinction to their gay-agenda. Silent all dissent by any means. That is Bull-crap! It's not a Christian or gay issue, its a First Amendment issue. I'm eating at Chick-Fil-A- every day this week not in Christ name but in the name of social-political freedom.
One last comment....this came in on a FB post from a friend of mine who owns a Chik-Fil-A in Tulsa, OK. Thought you might like to see the "reaching out to all"...........
Our food was hot and perfect! We waited only an hour and ten minutes in the drive through line, witnessed (and photographed) what appeared to be a man walking up and paying for people in the drive through, and I even ran in and witnessed your friendly staff in action as I ran to your amazingly clean bathroom. I'm so impressed with your 71st and Garnett store and staff! They were so friendly when I'm sure they were exhausted! I saw the dozens of discarded freebies your store had obviously handed to the protestors, too (who according to police weren't supposed to be on your property, but were). I knew you'd be loving on them while they were there. God has shown that "all things work together for good for those that love the Lord and are called according to His purpose." I am so proud we were able to witness such a blessing!
ryan, a great blog you wrote! I especially love the part about "free speech" and how christians never seem to be all about free speech except in this very instance! Oh, how silly we can be.
great thoughts a lot of great truths. I know not everyone is on board with it but I think its an incredibly well-written article worth reading and sharing with everyone, tell IBC to put it in chatter ;) I'm sure that'll get some more fun feedback! Thanks for being a voice of reason and voice to Jesus' heartbeat!
Ryan, the name of the author is Jimmy Dorell. He's the founder of Mission Waco.
My thoughts exactly. But I like Ryan's idea to show up and love these neighbors in opposition. I used the opportunity yesterday to actually talk with those there about what it was about and if about Free Speech, would we really do the same for our Gay neighbors? I posed a scenario to them. If city officials in Dallas said they would act to ban Freebirds from building a new restaurant because their CEO told a LGBT publication that he believed gay marriage should be a constitutional right would we show up to support Freebirds? I honestly would, and not just because I like Freebirds. But several there, even my friends said, "that's a tough one". And "I'm not sure I would.".
Hey Ryan,
Always fun when a blogger takes the time to respond to those who read and comment! Thanks!
The "Miller Test" was developed in 1973 not 1812 and even though community standards have changed since 1973 there are still lots of folks who oppose hard-core porn and are offended. Again, it takes D.A.'s who care and communities who will support him/her when they take action. It's been done in the past and with courageous leaders we could really make a difference in our culture! I court watched (attended court) obscenity cases for 10 years in Dallas for an organization that I served on the board for...almost every time an obscenity case made it to trial the jury agreed that it was obscene by their community standards. For now, I am just grateful that they are at least still prosecuting child porn.
And, for clarification, I was not equating percentage of gays with how we should approach relating to gays. Just suggesting that a person who doesn't have a gay friend shouldn't be shamed for not having a gay friend - maybe they just don't have a natural connection to anyone who is gay since they are only 2 - 4% of the general population. And, I am ALL about loving Muslims, too!!
Keep blogging!
Post a Comment